Human life is enmeshed with technology. Yet we know that our relationship to and use of technology is highly gendered. At the same time, gender itself can also be conceived as a technology, in different ways. For example, in her influential book Technologies of Gender: Essays on Theory, Film, and Fiction (1987), Teresa de Lauretis introduces the term “technologies of gender” to describe the mechanisms—such as media, literature, film, psychoanalysis, and institutional practices—that continuously create and regulate gender identities. With the advent of posthumanism, where, according to Donna Haraway’s essay “The Cyborg Manifesto, it becomes increasingly difficult to separate human from both animals and from machines, the very duality between humans, on the one hand, and advanced technology, on the other, is undermined, further problematizing what gender is, and may, be. In his study Testo Junkie, trans theorist Paul Preciado, argues that we currently live under the regime of pharmacopornographic capitalism where desires, images and bodies are co-created by the pornographic and the pharmaceutical and medical industry alike. In this regime, he argues, there is no “man” or “woman” beyond the technologies that produce them.
In this panel we try to think with the concept of gender both as a relationship to and as a product of technology, to interrogate what kind of gender configurations emerge from this conundrum and what are the possibilities of change, equity and justice within it.